A new study found that 54% of Americans accept Darwin’s theory, and believe human beings descended from earlier species of animals. This is not surprising given our society’s hostility to God. But it is contrary to modern science. In this post I will try to explain, as simply as I can, why modern science shows Darwin’s theory doesn’t work.
“Survival of the fittest” is not a force; it’s the self-evident statement that the organisms most likely to survive (the “fittest”) usually do survive. Big deal. There is no “search” button; there is nothing in Darwin’s theory that builds complex structures when needed.
We know from modern science that all creatures have very complex systems. We know from modern science that these systems are built from, and operated according to, code. Human beings have 3.2 billion “letters” of DNA code. In 2012, scientists studying human DNA found it contains four million switches to turn the systems in our body on and off. Each “switch” is complex code.
Mutations can and do occur anywhere in DNA. Over 99.99% of mutations are harmful or have no immediate effect. Mutations pop up in DNA at random, like typos in the text of a book.
Now imagine random changes, mutations, occurring throughout the 4,000,000 sections of our DNA that are switches. These mutations will degrade the vast majority of those switches. The overall trend will be downward, not upward. All the computer simulations show this, as I noted in this prior blog: https://countingtogod.com/mendels-accountant/
Darwin’s theory imagines that gradual changes to just one switch will eventually result in a better switch. But, even if that occurs (and no one has ever seen that occur), the other switches are being degraded. You can’t just “freeze” one switch, and try to improve that over eons, and pretend that the other switches are not harmed. It’s a simple numbers game; overall mutations degrade systems. Think of typos in the text of a book, or random changes in the programming behind the apps on your smart phone. Not likely to make the system better, and by not likely I mean never if you do the math. I made this point in both of my books. Mutations are a downhill slope. Mutations are like rust spots on the surface of a car. A few won’t slow down the car, but eventually the car will fall apart.
And that’s it! It’s really simple, despite the mindboggling refusal of many “educated” persons to see the obvious. Random changes to complex code, that can and do occur anywhere in the code and have no purpose or pattern, will not get you a better system. They will not build a new kind of animal.
This simple and obvious conclusion is supported by:
- The second law of thermodynamics — All systems are running down.
- The fossil record – the myriad varieties of “intermediate” organisms predicted by Darwin don’t exist.
- Laboratory experiments on bacteria showing a decline in function over tens of thousands of generations.
- As noted above, complex computer simulations of the effects of mutations.
- The existence of structures like the human brain, so complex that we cannot begin to understand how it works, that could not possibly have arisen from random changes.
Human beings are special. Don’t let anyone claim we are descended from pond scum. God designed us.
Thanks for reading.
2 thoughts on “Why Darwin’s Theory Doesn’t Work”
So true. I am a devout Christian and a physician. The theories on the origin of life, development of complexity and origin of humans never really troubled me because I had a firm witness that however it happened, God did it. What your book “Counting to God” did for me was set me onto the science and math that really highlights the glory and majesty of God’s creations. After your book I have gone one to read others and I am grateful to you and God for the opportunity to see it all in a new light. It is really shocking to see what a mountain of pretty simple and profound evidence there is for our Supreme Creator.
Absolutely right my friend.
Comments are closed.